Top

Introduction

Task

Process

Evaluation

Conclusion

Teacher Pages

Evaluation

	4	3	2	1	Score
Content Knowledge	All areas of the tasks are addressed and handled with a high degree of complexity Provides superior details, examples, and various forms of evidence which address the requirements of the task Has a superior level of understanding and fully appreciates the issues. A superior level of analysis.	Most areas of the tasks are addressed with an moderate degree of complexity Provides enough details, examples, and various forms of evidence to address the requirements of the task Has a good level of understanding and appreciation of the issues. A good level of analysis	Some of the areas are addressed and handled with an inadequate degree of complexity Has a fair understanding of the issues A fair level of analysis	Most areas of the tasks are addressed and handled simplistically; no depth of coverage Does not fully appreciate or understand the issues. A poor level of analysis
Team Work	It is evident that a mutual effort and cohesive unit created the final products	The team worked well together, but could have utilized each other's skills to a greater degree	The team had problems working together with little collaboration	The final product is not a result of a collaborative effort; no evidence of collaboration
Independent Work	The ideas expressed from specific role undertaken are evident and clear in the final product Concepts and arguments specific to role are fully developed and sourced. Work is finished on schedule for all team to benefit from perspective.	The ideas expressed from specific role undertaken are evident in final product Most of the concepts and arguments specific to role are developed and sourced Work is finished on schedule for all team to benefit from perspective.	Some ideas expressed from specific role undertaken are evident in final product Some of the concepts and arguments specific to role are developed and sourced. Work is not always finished on schedule for all team to benefit from perspective.	There is no clear evidence of ideas from specific role undertaken Few of the concepts and arguments specific to role are developed Work is not finished on schedule for all team to benefit from perspective.
Oral Presentation	Presents complex ideas with clarity and conviction, using illustrations, graphics, charts, to clarify points Uses delivery to emphasize and enhance the main elements and arguments of the report Clearly summarizes complex concepts Encourages and manages discussion and questions from the audience Adapts delivery to the experience and knowledge of the audience	Presents complex ideas with clarity and conviction, with some illustrations, graphics, charts, to clarify points Uses delivery to emphasize the main elements and arguments of the report Summarizes complex concepts Encourages and addresses questions from the audience Delivers concepts and arguments understandable to a general audience	Ideas and concepts presented are somewhat confusing Delivers some of the main elements of the report. Does not summarize the complex concepts Encourages questions from the Audience, but does not address them well	Ideas presented are not cohesive and are confusing Some ideas and concepts are irrelevant to the topic Does not encourage feedback or questions from the audience Uses language and jargon inappropriate to the audience
Written Report	Provides details, examples, and various forms of evidence which address the issues and requirements of the task Report is well written and professionally organized: uses headings, levels of subheadings to organize ideas; uses tables, graphs to illustrate concepts and ideas	Provides details, some examples, and some forms of evidence which address the issues and requirements of the task Report is organized: sequence and relationships are not difficult to follow	Report would be enhanced by providing details and examples, to illustrate main points Organization is not clear. Difficult to understand sequence and relationship	Report is poorly written, poorly organized: difficult to understand the main message or argument

Top Introduction Task Process Evaluation Conclusion Teacher Pages